Real world maths

I know I owe this blog a whole bunch of posts, but I seem to be permanently behind or too tired to form coherent sentences atm, so this is going to be another love you and leave you quick hit.

Yesterday we had our not-back-to-school picnic. It was fab – 8 families came, 4 times the turnout of last year 😉 It only rained a little bit and there were many bubbles blown, and some hardy souls even paddled! I have pics and vids, but they will have to way til I’ve checked who is in what and what I can blog.

Then afterwards it was rookie lifeguard. Tim picked Small up from the beach, and Big and I sauntered towards the swimming pool. Just as we got there she said ‘do you have a bobble? Oh and I need clothes!’

Aargh. So baby off hip and into wrap where she instantly fell asleep so that we could double time it up the hill into town and into Peacocks. She doesn’t have shorts of any description and that was what she’d been told she needed for swimming in, so we found a pair of pjs with shorts and a vest T shirt. £4. I did wonder whether it ought to be a proper T shirt with sleeves, but we decided they would do and hotfooted it back to the pool in time for her to be poolside and waiting at 4pm.

And of course, yes, the T shirt needs to have sleeves. Would it kill these ppl to write out the requirements at the beginning of the course and hand them out? Slightly cross now, although I daresay she’ll use the vest T for sleeping in, and she’s got other old Ts that she can swim in next week.

On the way home, eventually, we passed the local indian takeaway, which has a sign outside about the Pakistan floods. Mindful of both the #Blogladesh campaign, and Ellen’s recent article on children and the news we took a look at the numbers.

20 million children homeless. 6 million in severe danger of death through malnutrition.

They are big numbers. They don’t mean anything much to me, and they certainly don’t mean anything to Big. So we had a think about how we could think about them. There’s about 60 million ppl in this country. So if 20 million of them were homeless – that’s one in three.

1/3 rd of this country with nowhere to live. Big worked out the maths. She looked shocked. She worked out the numbers where the children were concerned as well and we talked about developing countries v the developed world. She’s rather fascinated by the Victorians and the industrial revolution, and brought up the comparison herself that perhaps developing countries are more like that historical period. Not like living in this country.

It didn’t hugely upset her. I think the numbers are too big to grasp, even when you make them into fractions that you can look at around you. It’s too remote, even when you look at pictures of starving children with flies around them. There are no magic wands we can wave, or incantations a la Potter world to rescue these ppl.

We give to charity, not least by buying lots of stuff from the local red cross and taking our stuff there to be recycled where possible. We try to tread softly on this world – downsized to one car which often goes days without being used, and we walk where possible. I know we have too many children – I am trying to minimise soa’s impact by using cloth nappies and handmedown baby stuff.

But it’s not enough. And I don’t know what would be.


Home Ed Inspiration, Ideas, and Activities

Click the links below and scroll through my collection of ideas, workshops, excursions, and more to discover practical everyday activities you can do together in and around your home classroom.


Comments

15 responses to “Real world maths”

  1. Why do you think you have too many children? I agree with you that we shouldn’t damage the earth, or waste resources, but I don’t equate having kids with environmental destruction. In my experience its the smaller families that have the cash to buy everything new, and go on two foreign holidays a year (flying, of course) and that can afford to eat meat every day etc etc. So wouldn’t they have a similar size carbon footprint to those of us with bigger families, who can’t have these luxuries?

    1. @Debbie hm, I suppose that bigger families are more likely to be thrifty so there is that. And I suppose if the children go out into the world with that attitude/ behaviour ingrained then their families ought to be just as thrifty and un impactful.

  2. I’ve never looked at it that way before Debbie – thanks, feel a bit less guilty!
    At our pool, all the kids are in long trousers and long sleeves. And no goggles, which was the hardest thing for them to get used to, I think.

    1. @Alison didn’t think I could be the only one feeling a little guilty!
      I thought you’d said something about long trousers and sleeves. Was quite surprised they were told shorts tbh, but maybe they’ll get more clothing over the next couple of years. Yes, it’s no goggles and no hats, although girls with long hair have been told to tie it back.

  3. It’s one of those things where it’s the group behaviour is more important, as opposed to particular individuals. If some people ahve lots of kids and some people have none then it can balance out (I’m sure that we are still <2 children per family on average)
    Anyway I suspect though that the major impact of people is not when they are children but over the rest of their lifetime.

    1. @Daddybean yes, it’s adult behaviour that counts I’m sure, but am hoping that thriftiness will carry through. Somehow doubt it with Small…

  4. I don’t know what is enough, either. But d’you know, I’ve never thought about my having too many children. I’ve always hoped (I do hope someone isn’t going to shoot me down in flames for this) that I’m bringing up four thoughtful, socially aware, environmentally conscious children who will hopefully do their bit to look after the world when they grow up. As I’m sure yours will, too.
    .-= Rachael´s last blog ..a celebration of family =-.

    1. @Rachel have you not? It’s something I worry about tbh. Am fairly sure that one of my children is not even slightly socially aware or particularly environmentally conscious, I’ve got another 10 years or so to get that through to him…
      Doubt there will be any flames – lots of big families reading here 🙂

  5. Really don’t see the point in feeling guilty about how many children you have. Strikes me as being a rather sad way to feel about your children tbh. But then I don’t really buy into the whole carbon footprint thing anyway, it seems to be designed to inflict guilt on people, and IME guilt is about the most destructive emotion a person can feel. We are probably far more environmentally concious than the average family around us, but it’s something that is just part of the feeling of respect for the land that I’ve always tried to encourage in my children as it was in me by my parents. So if I have more children than the *average* family then that’s a good thing because the attitude will filter out further 😉

  6. I tend to agree with Tech above with the idea of spreading the attitude further – mine are all recycling obsessed, they’re all aware that we boycott Nestle products and the older two (10 and 8) understand why. I think they absorb a lot by osmosis – certainly that’s been the experience of friends of mine with older children who have left home (and are now just as ranty and militant and generally lovely as their parents!).
    .-= Rachael´s last blog ..a celebration of family =-.

  7. Ooh, that should say 8 but seems to have turned into a little smiley face with glasses! Oops.
    .-= Rachael´s last blog ..a celebration of family =-.

  8. OrganisedPauper avatar
    OrganisedPauper

    There’s always going to be someone who’d rather rain on your parade than get on with enjoying their own life/children. I would say that being thoughtful and caring are more important than family size when it comes to any issue, environmental or otherwise. 🙂

  9. Jax, you and me between us have the right number of children. Tim’s brother has non so Alison can have his quota. My next door neighbour has 2 grown up boys with severe learning difficulties and will probably never father children so there’s another 4 spares for someone to claim….. I know that there is a small upwards trend but I don’t think it’s anything like as steep as it was 100 or so years ago when it was still normal to have LOTS of children and medicine was just about advanced enough that most of them survived. I think, on the whole, your impact on our world is not one that should leave you feeling at all guilty.
    As for clubs etc that don’t send letters home about what children need to parents…. just don’t get me started!!!!!

  10. HelenHaricot avatar
    HelenHaricot

    glad rookie lifeguard good. increasing the population by having more than2 children does increase your footprint and put a strain on the worlds resources. it doesn’t mean you can’t, but there is no way around that. 🙁
    http://www.zerofootprintkids.com/kids_home.aspx
    a nice on for kids [without family size!]

  11. You do not have too many children at all. I dont know what to do for the best either – life can be so hard
    .-= TheMadHouse´s last blog ..Wonderful Whitby Abbey =-.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get in Touch

Need support for your home ed journey? Looking for tutoring for your young person? Have an idea for a collaboration? I’d love to hear from you!

How I Can Help

After 20+ years of home educating my four children (two now adults), I’ve gathered a wealth of experience that I’m passionate about sharing. Beyond blogging and guest writing, I offer several services designed to support families on their home education journey.

Resources to Support Your Home Ed Journey

I’ve put together a collection of resources that I’ve genuinely found useful over the years—things that have actually made a difference in our home education. Whether you’re just starting out or looking to freshen things up, there’s something here to help. These are the tools, guides, and materials I’d recommend to a friend, because they work.