Or more accurately, what do we need to provide/ teach?
As often happens on here, I’m reconsidering our educational provision. I tried last year to be autonomous, and it didn’t really work – I just ended up with two fractious children spending way too much time watching trash and playing repetitive computer games. (Hm. Tries not to think about Big Bang Theory/ NCIS
repeats and Bubble island.)
So I tried a variety of ways to provide some structure. I gave them index cards and a box to keep them in, and they wrote activities on the cards and used the system for two days. Not a great success. Eventually we ended up with a weekly timetable for Big and a three work requirement for Small.
This worked well for Small. If he is given space and occasional reminders/ prompts, he does educate himself. He’s pretty handy with google/ wikipedia, likes a variety of online educational game sites, and can often be found with his head stuck in one reference book or another. Like the other day when he was using RSPB Pocket Guide to British Birds Book to try to identify the bird he’d seen in the garden.
Big, as we’ve remarked once or twice, is a very different creature. To begin with the timetable worked *reasonably* well, in that she was productively engaged at least some of the time, which if nothing else gave Small time to himself. Otherwise she interrupts him and drags him off to play, which might *sound* like a good thing but actually results in a bad tempered Small, not a being you wish to share house space with, believe me.
But over time she became more and more resistant to the idea that she had more on her list than him, even though when it came down to it, he often spent hours more than she did “working”.
So I let it drift. Which was almost definitely a mistake. My children need some direction and structure, and while email strewing might be enough for Small it isn’t for Big. And I get jumpy around her basic skillset – she has a perfectionist streak that means if she doesn’t think she’llo get it right, she won’t do it. All those singapore maths books I bought, and they are just sitting there, unloved 🙁
Then I read about this, an experiment where children who were taught less learned more.
Aargh! Does this mean that I should back right off, mathematically speaking? Continue with day to day examples, measurement in baking or craft (although it turns out, after all these years of doing craft with her that she doesn’t enjoy that either. Which is why she never voluntarily finishes anything, or picks up a project of her own accord. Tim spotted that one, I thought she liked making things 🙁 ), work with money and time but worry about the foundations later? And what of Small who has just hit something in his maths book that he struggles with, and has previously always loved numbers? (Subtraction with borrowing in HTUs in case you were wondering. It’s the borrowing that does for him, everything previously he’s done in his head.)
I don’t know. I wish I didn’t worry so much about the long term effects of home education. Although if they were in school I’d probably be worrying about SATs or some such instead I guess.
So, am I backing off or charging in? I’ve kind of sidestepped it with a mathletics subscription, but I’m still thinking about it all. Wondered if anyone else had similar subject quandaries?




Leave a Reply