The plate of cookies.

Today’s latest hilarious government outtake – a wonderful trend on twitter of comments #mycurtainsareclosedbecause.

No, I didn’t quite understand it either, until I found the guardian article. Apparently George Osborne has commented on the unfairness of those on benefits keeping their ‘blinds down‘ while others head out to work.

Bewildering. Does he really think that that is why some people have their blinds closed? Or is he, yet again, trying the divide and rule tactic? If we’re all sniping at each other, then we aren’t watching the government. As a friend tweeted me, it’s like the plate of cookies. You have a plate with 10 cookies on it. The rich guy takes 9, and says to the labourer, that unemployed bum is after your cookie.

Are we really that stupid? Are we really going to fall for this? I can think of some ways to cut the deficit without cutting benefits hugely, or rearranging the pay structure as I suggested earlier. How about if Vodafone paid their taxes?

This made me want to laugh or cry too.

Osborne defended targeting the poor while cutting the top rate of tax, from 50p to 45p. He said that it was the “poor looking for work” who had paid the price for the “phony 50p rate” because it had made the country “uncompetitive”.

How does targeting the working poor, (because let’s not forget many of the benefit cuts so far actually hit people in work. For example, most new housing benefit claims are from people in work) make the country more competitive? I’m not seeing it.

But then little that politicians do makes much sense to me. I was having a discussion on twitter about how hard it is to find someone to vote for – I can’t vote labour and end up with Ed Balls in power after the fiasco of the Badman review and the attack on home educators. I can’t vote Tory – threatening the abortion limit, then saying they’d remove benefits from people having too many children (make your mind up, do you want people to have babies and then let them starve to death, like that poor child in Westminster?), slashing benefits from the disabled, but letting corporations get away without paying their taxes.

Which leaves me with LibDems, who aren’t very likely to get into power on their own after being hand in glove with the Conservatives this time around, or a protest vote for someone like the Greens.

I haven’t done that since I was 19. I voted Green instead of Conservative *then* read the manifesto and was utterly horrified about what I’d voted for. I’m not sure what they stand for at the moment, but at that point control was big on the agenda.

I’d like a real choice. Any suggestions?


Home Ed Inspiration, Ideas, and Activities

Click the links below and scroll through my collection of ideas, workshops, excursions, and more to discover practical everyday activities you can do together in and around your home classroom.


Comments

22 responses to “The plate of cookies.”

  1. A real choice? Umm… :o(
    Incidentally, our curtains are often closed because I’m the only person (in a house of four) who appears to bother opening them…

    1. perfectly reasonable reason. I think I’ve pretty much got our bunch trained now…

  2. That’s supposed to be a sad face! 🙁

    1. I think the nose confused it 😉

  3. I don’t think you’re ever going to find one party that meets all your criteria, because that would just be you, not a political party. So you have to pick the one that fits most of your criteria. For me that will always be Labour, even if there are some things they do that trouble me. For you, it might be someone else.
    It is hard, though, when one party has one thing that goes so completely against your principles that it can’t not put them out of the running. The Green party’s stance on Europe did that for me a few years ago, though plenty of their policies did seem good. For you, the Badman thing might be your one that puts Labour out.
    The other thing I try hard to do, is put out of my mind as far as possible, how their policies will affect me personally and try to think about how they will affect the country as a whole. Sometimes something that will be detrimental to me (e.g. a tax hike at a certain level; more regulations for the self-employed…) might be very good for the majority (I personally consider more the poor, the elderly, people with disabilities, than the rich or even the middle classes, though don’t not consider them entirely).
    Anyway, there you go. My thoughts.

  4. Yes. Don’t vote. Read Douglas carswells new book – he explains exactly why I and millions of others don’t, and why the whole charade is pointless.

    1. Is this the I democracy thing? I think I read an article about it, was fascinating.

      1. Yes. It explains very clearly why we are in the state we are. How the tax system was manipulated to create ever bigger government. It is a fascinating, validating and easy read.

        1. we’ve just been studying Abraham Lincoln, and I discovered that it was he who said that government should be ‘by the people, of the people, for the people’
          Well, I don’t feel it is. I feel it has become an elite class – most certainly financially elite, become and/or remain politians because of the acquisition of power and money.
          The ancient greeks had a random ballot system, like our jury system. People were randomly selected for a year’s service to the people. Far better idea I feel.

          1. Completely agree with you – we refer to them as the new gentry. And also feel that the random selection system may well have some merits.

        2. I’ll have to get my hands on a copy. Thanks for the tip.

  5. I guess when no party is going to fit exactly what you want, you have to choose a few policy areas that are most important to you and work out which party is closest to you on those.
    I don’t agree with every Green policy, but their vision of a happy and healthy society is the closest to my vision, and they are also the most democratic party internally (any member can bring a motion to a conference and have it debated in an attempt to change party policy) so they *usually* get my vote. If I’m living in an area where it’s a tight race between Labour and anyone else then I’ll vote Labour rather than Green.

    1. unfortunately they seem a bit anti Home Ed, maybe because they want to push their views/beliefs/agenda/doctrine through the school system

      1. Yeah, I didn’t know about their stance on Home Ed until I read some articles on it yesterday. I don’t think they’re anti, I think the current position is that they will support but not actively promote? I think that is less likely to be so they can ‘indoctrinate’ people with their views and more because they’d like to see schools that better suited the needs of all children. It may be overly idealist but I don’t think it’s sinister.

        1. Here you go, here’s the first line of their policy on it…
          ED150 We support parents’ rights to educate their children in settings other than at school.

        2. Difficult to know for sure unless you dig under the policy, and is definitely something I would look at deeply before voting for them.

          1. maybe I’m paranoid, but it was a warning light for me!

  6. I think not voting Labour because of their regulating-home-education policy was/is incredibly selfish and parochial. A policy which would (unjustly, imo – I did my campaigning re the Badman report) restrict the (currently-enjoyed complete) freedom of a few thousand people? Which is almost certainly entirely work-round-able? As compared to the Tory disregard for the safety and welfare of millions?
    I hope all those HEors who voted Conservative after Badman and Balls are sorry now, I really do.

    1. I think it’s indicative of their stance on control of liberties, and that the invasion of personal privacy would run far deeper than I could possibly countenance. So no, I couldn’t vote labour and their attitude to home education is only the tip of the iceberg.

      1. How it affected us individually is where we found the motivation to fight it, the reason to fight stood alone. The reality is, Badman was a symptom of a lot of ideological problems, surrounding personal liberty and decision-making, the nature of parental responsibility, and a whole world of policy-based evidence-making. If that’s their general approach to government, then it’s worth fighting, regardless of who is most strongly affected.

        1. but surely my vote is a personal thing?! I am not going to vote for a party who attacks my way of life!
          I’m not going to think ‘oh, but far more people choose/are duped/have no choice but to send their children to school, so I’ll vote for a party who’s attacking my freedoms because other people don’t care about that’
          Sorry, but that’s a bit mad.
          And it wasn’t just attacking Home schooling, it was attacking the whole nation of parental responsibility and part a far more general policy view that the state owns all including children in my opinion.

          1. nation = notion, sorry about that

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get in Touch

Need support for your home ed journey? Looking for tutoring for your young person? Have an idea for a collaboration? I’d love to hear from you!

How I Can Help

After 20+ years of home educating my four children (two now adults), I’ve gathered a wealth of experience that I’m passionate about sharing. Beyond blogging and guest writing, I offer several services designed to support families on their home education journey.

Resources to Support Your Home Ed Journey

I’ve put together a collection of resources that I’ve genuinely found useful over the years—things that have actually made a difference in our home education. Whether you’re just starting out or looking to freshen things up, there’s something here to help. These are the tools, guides, and materials I’d recommend to a friend, because they work.