The Children Act is law. We fought the good fight, but the majority of the population hasn’t even heard of it (as an aside, am I the only one that finds the lack of mainstream media attention freaky?), and probably doesn’t care. It allows for the setting up of databases (singular, plural, you name it, they can do it) that will keep tabs on all of our children, and therefore, us. It requires different departments to share data – and there will be a field amongst all of this for educational setting. When that turns out blank, you can be reasonably sure that the LEA is going to come knocking. And when they do, they may well bring Social Services with them, as a recent peek at a letter from a local LEA implies *they* think that home education is a welfare issue.
It isn’t. You know that, I know that. But all these professionals are running scared, that sooner or later there will be another Victoria Climbie, and if they haven’t frantically shared all the information possible, they will be to blame. I could go on to explain how all of this has nothing to do with Victoria Climbie, and the databases were designed before the report into her death came out, but hey, you can find all that out other places. I could explain how this isn’t going to prevent any more deaths, in fact it might even cause them, but you can all put the figures together and work out that fewer social workers doing more work means less ppl on the front line and more fiddling with computers.
So we’re all out in the open now, it’s just a matter of time. Oh we could challenge the act in the courts, such things are being discussed on various politically active lists, and by ppl like ARCH. If there were any justice in the world we’d win. We have a legal right to a private family life. We have a legal right to educate our children how we see fit. But there isn’t a lot of justice in the world, is there?
So what do we do? My theory is that we live our lives. We get on with getting out there. We don’t hide, duck behind the parapets, or keep our heads down – what is that teaching our children? That we’re scared of authority? That we are ashamed of what we are doing? I’m not either of those. And if I talk to ppl who’ve never heard of home education and I leave them with a pleasant memory of a normal person, then I think that that has to be positive. The woman I spoke to this morning had come across home education before, and thought it sounded lovely. She wasn’t defensive of her choice to send her children to school, and I thought that was fine too. They can be difficult conversations, but with a bit of practise, I’m sure I’ll get better at them. 😉




Comments
4 responses to “Pondering.”
well I’m with you. I too feel that we have nothing to hide and if anyone wants to come along and check that then check it they may. It is a dreadful state of affairs if they do need to simply on the basis of us not sending our children to school, and a great waste of time and resources, particularly when those times and resources are so stretched and could be put to far far better use.
I was talking to a midwife or health visitor or someone about it only the other day. I mentioned that i reckoned i could tot up at least 5 “at risk” flags for my kids already and she nearly wet herself. And then made some remark about “well i hope they don’t have too much on the day they come round, cos you’ll probably talk em to death….”
Charmed…!
Way to go Jax!!! and ROFLOL Merry
Jax,
After a little research, my opinion on the matter is that your rights are established clearly in law by the Education Act 1996, specifically Part I, Chapter 1, Section 7 (“or otherwise”) and Part I, Chapter 1, Section 9. Unless these have been specifically repealed or amended, none of the other Acts can possibly apply to home educators as you are not state education bodies or other such organisations.
IANAL, of course, and my resources are limited, but I’m happy to help you research the law with regard to any worries you may have. That’s what I’m good for! 🙂
Libertus