Lord Lucas would like to know

How to assess home education?

Hm, as I’ve said in his comments, I’m not sure I understand the question. But I’m getting ahead of myself. Who is Lord Lucas, and why should we care what he wants to know?

Well, Lord Lucas has already spoken on behalf of home education, as I blogged a little while ago. I suspect that most, if not all, of his briefing and experience come from EO, and therefore his view of where we are going could be more in line with the EO report as produced by the group of five.

Unfortunately, this may well mean that he doesn’t really understand the current position on home education, and why the majority of the home education community feel that it’s absolutely fine and requires no further changes.

The current position is quite straightforward really.

The parent of every child of compulsory school age shall cause him to receive efficient full-time education suitable—

(a)to his age, ability and aptitude, and

(b)to any special educational needs he may have,

either by regular attendance at school or otherwise.

So it’s the parent’s responsibility. It’s the parent’s responsibility to choose a school and send a child to it, or to decide on that otherwise option, which varies probably rather more than the types of school on offer.

And what does the LA have to do with this? Not a lot. They can make informal enquiries of a family to see whether an education is on offer, and if they are not satisfied, then they can go through a procedure, which parents can challenge, to require a child to be sent to school. Most parents manage to satisfy LAs with reports, or meetings, which do not have to be in the home and do not have to include the children.

And if they have welfare concerns?

That’s a separate issue. It’s dealt with by social workers, trained in child protection, and they have different rights of access to the child. In extreme circumstances the police can be involved.

Home educated children are subject to the same systems as any other child in the country when it comes to welfare concerns. That’s how it should be.

Back to that assessment question. How come parents who home educate aren’t subject to the same kind of assessment that teachers and schools go through? It’s quite simple really. Schools are discharging a responsibility to parents, and are accountable to parents who deserve feedback about what schools are doing. If your child attends a private school you’ll get even more accountability and feedback as you are paying them up front, state schools sometimes forget who pays the bills – all taxpayers.

So parents certainly don’t need to be assessed in the way schools are. I think it’s reasonable that LAs make informal enquiries, it’s a good balance to just check that parents are aware of their responsibilities. But that’s as far as it goes. We don’t need assessment, and we won’t stand still for assessment, especially when it’s conducted by ppl who don’t know anything more about education than that which they learned in school. Because let’s face it, we didn’t learn about home education in school, did we?

If you feel like popping over and educating Lord Lucas, please do so. But please also remember that he is nominally on our side, and it’s not really his fault that so far he doesn’t seem to get it.

Comments

4 responses to “Lord Lucas would like to know”

  1. I like this sort of simple reiteration of the current position and the fact there has been no case (compelling or otherwise) to change it on the grounds of education or welfare.
    One question. Under the current system how do LEAs make the ‘reasonable’ informal enquiries if they don’t know who is doing it? If it’s a ‘good’ balance should it apply to all HErs or not?

  2. If Contactpoint really has gone live, then they know who is doing it. No further lists/ registration necessary. (Although I’m beginning to have the sneaking suspicion that they haven’t actually set it up to allow the kind of search they need to do. When it comes right down to it, they can always have one poor idiot sit and go through all children in the area, one by one…)
    If Contactpoint hasn’t gone live, or is withdrawn, not really sure. I don’t like the idea of registration as I think it will be too prone to abuse. At least Contactpoint covers all children in the country. Theoretically. Perhaps.
    Am open to discussion on this point. How do they know to send school place forms to the children they do send forms to? Noting that they’ve never sent forms for either of my children, and they should have known about both of them through nursery funding really.

  3. Well, on reflection, I am coming round to the view that ‘informal’ enquiries that I am complying with the law aren’t reasonable full stop.
    We were trying to think of any other law where the authorities have a right to simply enquire as to whether you are complying with it without any kind of probably cause.
    I own a car which means I could break the law by driving recklessly. I don’t get informal enquiries from the police where I have to convince them that I am not in order that they don’t take my car away.
    I own sharp knives which means I could stab people to death. I don’t get informal enquiries from the police where I have to convince them that I am not in order that they don’t take my kitchen devils away. The state doesn’t even know I own sharp knives. Perhaps there should be a sharp knife owning database?
    I could say I am home-educating and break the law by not providing an education. I could. Like I could break the law through the misuse of cars or knives. But like cars and knives surely the assumption is that I am not breaking the law and action should only be taken if there is evidence that I have or am very likely to do so.

  4. Hi Jax. Thanks for the link – I left a comment on Lord Lucas’ blog (no. 62 I think!), and I think you’re right to point out that he does seem to be ‘trying’ to be on our side – lots of the commentators seemed as angry as they would at Badman or Balls.
    Trying to be constructive, I wrote that it would help if the Government were not so reticent and aghast at any mention of more support / facilities / resources / exams etc provided for HErs, and also that they need to guarantee understanding and appreciation of autonomous education. Personally I would not mind having more to do (within reason) with the LA if it was in exchange for the above.
    Ending, of course, echoing everyone’s ideal position that nothing should or needs to be changed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *