We use cookies to optimise our website and our service.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Comments
9 responses to “Primelocation”
no, but would love to live there
Ditto. So long as it’s a sustainable intentional community.
How about 2 million?
http://212.50.188.108/cgi-win/vebra.cgi?details1?src=vebra&PropertyCode=1581001/LEEBA/10294/1
Chris, can you find again that hotel we were looking at – the one with loads of bedrooms, except some of them weren’t in the house?
That was cheap! I wonder whether it could be converted to something useful …
Oooh, Alison, that’s more like it. Sorry Jax, yours was just too far away. One for the North, one for the South maybe?!
Hi Jemmo – that was the intention – and why we’d need more than the 890,000 the buildings cost, ‘cos we’d need some land as well. Alison, that really does look rather gorgeous – yes, why not let’s have two while we’re dreaming 😉
Ohh very nice. But apparently there is a co-housing community 20 minutes from here. I’ve always wondered what those wooden houses were and now I know! If only it wasn’t in Stroud, I might be tempted!
http://tinyurl.com/6kjeu
Look at the location of this….probably not big enough for more than two and a half families…. 🙁
I regularly have a mooch around this sort of thing on the web – but know I couldn’t hack it! I know a couple who live in an intentional community and she assures me they really don’t live in each other’s pockets and she gets loads of her own space – I guess you don’t know till you’ve tried, but I remain dubious. I wouldn’t mind a community-village so to speak though.
I could live in a sort of centerparcs type one – own houses and stuff but not in a melrose type one. I’d get way too stressed!