EO has produced a pdf for the review which you can read here
I would like to state for the record that I am not now a member of EO although we were during our first year or so of home ed, as I think many ppl are. My understanding of the organisation and of this particular document is that it is not democratic – there has been no canvassing of membership to produce this response, many members probably do not even know it has been sent in.
Now, you may agree with most of the body of the document, you may not. My first thought was that it was a great shame that it hadn’t been proofread, but as I commented elsewhere, it’ll probably fit in nicely with most government documents anyway.
The central repeating idea appears to be the recommendation for a Committee for Home Education or a Home Education Committee (there isn’t even consistency on the naming!) of approx 10 ppl which will serve to represent the views of all home educators and bridge the gap between government and home educators. Excuse me a moment, I have a really bad cough, and when I laugh, I start coughing. It may be some time before I can type sensibly again.
Can anyone who has met any home educators really imagine the existence of *one* group that could represent all of us? I can’t believe even the government in the form of Mr Badman could be that naive. But just in case they can be, I say again, EO do not speak for me.




Leave a Reply