<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Push for &#8216;personalised&#8217; learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liveotherwise.co.uk/makingitup/2007/03/19/push-for-personalised-learning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liveotherwise.co.uk/makingitup/2007/03/19/push-for-personalised-learning/</link>
	<description>montessori at school, autonomous at home, all learning together</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gill</title>
		<link>http://liveotherwise.co.uk/makingitup/2007/03/19/push-for-personalised-learning/#comment-235364</link>
		<dc:creator>Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveotherwise.co.uk/makingitup/2007/03/19/push-for-personalised-learning/#comment-235364</guid>
		<description>I can't see how they could provide a truly personalised service even if they wanted to. Huge institutions don't work that way, do they? They have to work on systems, and systems are the direct opposite to personalisation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see how they could provide a truly personalised service even if they wanted to. Huge institutions don&#8217;t work that way, do they? They have to work on systems, and systems are the direct opposite to personalisation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t-bird</title>
		<link>http://liveotherwise.co.uk/makingitup/2007/03/19/push-for-personalised-learning/#comment-235243</link>
		<dc:creator>t-bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveotherwise.co.uk/makingitup/2007/03/19/push-for-personalised-learning/#comment-235243</guid>
		<description>you know, I had to read that article twice before I realised that it had nothing to do with choices and a lot to do with electioneering, I kept thinking it was just me not reading it right....  And what exactly was new with most of it????  it all sounded like everything I've heard/read for the last few years.  Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, I had to read that article twice before I realised that it had nothing to do with choices and a lot to do with electioneering, I kept thinking it was just me not reading it right&#8230;.  And what exactly was new with most of it????  it all sounded like everything I&#8217;ve heard/read for the last few years.  Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
